Last 10More on the Google App Engine
Sunday, April 13 2008 Some thoughts on the Google Web App Engine Tuesday, April 8 2008 Web 2.0: Marketing & Technology - Social Networking model Monday, March 31 2008 IP-address reverse lookup: Who's behind an IP address? Tuesday, March 25 2008 Best Austin Jobs Monday, February 11 2008 A fun SEO service SPAM Wednesday, September 5 2007 Do you Wilf? Thursday, August 9 2007 Is web evolution accelerating? Saturday, August 4 2007 Web experiment one. Any takers? Saturday, July 28 2007 The narrowing tip. Did I miss anything? Wednesday, July 11 2007 Other goodies |
Tuesday, September 19. 2006Kubuntu rocks on Dell Inspiron E1705Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Like we give a shit? I'm so sick of reading a news site or blog where some noob writes something like "Ubuntu is so awesome, it has PS2 mouse support@#!".
I mean really! Whatever. Ubuntu is just debian with newer packages. Noobs like you should thank hal, dbus and kde. Linux is Linux. Get it. Just different package managers and packages. Stupid noob. Michael,
Thanks for your comment. You are wrong, I am not a "noob", actually ... not one at all. You are right, Ubuntu is “technically” just another debian-based distribution with newer packages around it. However, this is not the place where I discuss my Linux technical credentials, nor that was the point of the article, so I will move on to what I believe are more interesting topics. The point is, I really like the experience I'm having with Kubuntu on my notebook from the non-technical, simple everyday desktop user point of view. It makes me so happy to see the difference when I compare this experience against the memories from installing Slackware on some other machines sometime about 10 years ago. I am extremelly happy about it because I would really like to see Linux become adopted in this market segment as much as it is adopted today on the IT-professional users and servers market. I also like the benefits this brings by enabling everyday non-technical users to use such a powerful and profesional OS and at a very low TCO. After all, computing to them only makes sense if it does makes their life simpler. Bring “simple” together with “powerful” and “cheap”, and the potential is huge. When I used to run my own small Linux and IT consulting company, some of my clients were very interested in deploying Linux on some of their desktops PCs. At that time, Linux wasn't really ready for it. I even had a few meetings with the guys from Caldera on “producing” a particular line of desktop machines with their Linux distribution pre-loaded on them. Didn't happen. Today, we're much, much closer to this reality and some businesses and organizations are already deploying Linux on their desktops. This is great news for everybody, but mostly for underdeveloped, poor countries where bringing cheap, powerful, readily-available simple technology can make a big impact on their infrastructure and significantly boost their economic and development. Think of children learning on Linux-powered desktops in poor schools that can't afford expensive software licenses. A similar case can be argued for non-for-profit organizations. I believe there is a huge potential for Linux on the desktop and notebooks, and a few of my friends follow this very closely too. Some people actually liked the article a lot. The packages, look and usability are all key points where Linux still has to prove itself a bit more in order to be able to really penetrate into this market and lower the TCO for business and organizations to deploy it on their desktop machines without fears. These are the main points that drove me to write this late-night before-bed short story / friendly article. Again, thanks for reading and for the comment. I'm sorry the article disapointed you. If you are searching for a place to read on technical linux-related matters then this is not the right place. This is an Entrepreneurhsip, Marketing and Techonology blog (in that order). Peace, Seb He is, however, quite correct. There's nothing necessary about this article, it is not an imforiatvie review: just another slop of words for .
My Top 5 Linux distros are (from my experience, various computers)
Ubuntu, Mepis, PCLinuxOS, Freespire, PuppyLinux. My top 1 is PCLinuxOS, mature intelligent, elegant, speedy, easy to use. I just booted up using the Kubuntu 6.x live CD and I must say that I am very pleased with the out of the box ease, the way the live CD booted up very fast (as compared to say, Knoppix) , the clean fonts and KDE GUI. Also the Synaptics touch pad seems very well behaved with the default settings. I entered Kubuntu rocks! into Google and I am here. I have installed Suse on this laptop before and it was great, but I removed it because of the need to visit some sites using Internet Explorer. I love Kubuntu because it is based on Debian and is a much leaner install to begin with. I will nuke the Windows partition soon, and hope I can print to a printer attached to a Windows PC - I could never manage that with SUSE.
1. PCLinuxOS will awlays garner the best "out of the box" experience for the average home desktop user (read: ex-windows user or "tweener").
2. Ubuntu/Kubuntu will always run between PCLOS and Debian for the average home desktop user. 3. Debian will always maintain it's "old guard" user base. Ups and Downs: PCLinuxOS is a hobbyist/enthusiast supported distro. It has no where near the resources of distros like Ubuntu and Debian. Upgrading packages will always be slow and sometimes painful as priorities such as real life of the developers will weigh in. However having Flash and Java and Amarok working straight out of the box, FIrefox set with IPV6 disabled, and many other tweaks the average user will spend all day setting up makes this distro shine as a newcomer star. If you won't be a bleeding edge user, this distro, IMO, is rock solid. Based on Mandrake/driva originally. Ubuntu/Kubuntu - Solid distro with $$$ behind it. Resources, including web footprint (read: repositories and package availability) make this a solid distro. It is overly popular and over hyped but it is a solid and good distro. Kubuntu started out really weak, the cross over from Ubuntu left much weakness and the first 2 releases put me off greatly. Adding KDE to Ubuntu seems to be the stronger solution. IMO this is not the best "out of the box" experience and why I don't consider it #1. Debian - I have zero experience with this distro outside of derivatives such as Ubuntu. From my understanding it is just a slower, more proven and solid (read more stable) distro than most of it's derivatives. It's web presence is immense and if you aren't a bleeding edge user this distro probably outshines the previous two by leagues. Fedora Core X - Large company backing, solid web presence, weak out of the box experience. I like the distro but whenever I install it the amount of time it takes to tweak it for a standard home-user desktop is just a bit too much for me to swallow. Suse X (openSuse) - This distro has always been slow to respond on systems I have used it on. It falls somewhere around FCX in setup time for the average home desktop user, and in the end just lacks what I like in distros. The rest - While I have tried many other flavors, the previous list tend to overshadow them for one reason or another, typically web presence and user friendliness. Just my opinions, those of the average desktop user/tweener. |
BestAustinJobs.comQuicksearchAbout meClick here to learn more about me. E-mail meBlogrollCategoriesLicense![]() Articles posted on this blog (excluding comments) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License. |