The Sebastian

As promised, here goes a small update on my toast traffic, my Top 10 referers (out of 20) table as measured by phpOpenTracker for Nov 20th:



Number / # Visitors refered / URL

1 9 28.13% yournameontoast.com/

2 5 15.63% sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/11/your_name_on_to.html

3 1 3.13% digg.com/linux_unix/Kubuntu_rocks_on_Dell_Inspiron_E1705

4 1 3.13% digg.com/search?area=all&age=all&sort=new&s=milliondollarhomepage&submit=Search

5 1 3.13% digg.com/submit?title=Is it for real ?&bodytext=What's toastmadeof...&catid=305&captchatext=d6mbj&captchaid=2b2aca82f20eda145e2b9e10b9ea5047&submit=SubmitStory&url=www.busto.dk/blog/?p=253&phase=3&key=59047825

6 1 3.13% digg.com/users/mieteck/friends/dugg

7 1 3.13% email.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1

8 1 3.13% popurls.com/mint/

9 1 3.13% sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/10/the_next_millio.html

10 1 3.13% www.digg.com/users/sethgodin/dugg

So, just for yesterday alone, that's a single $10.01 toast for 9 visits; the rate comes out to 1.11 $/visit. As an experiment, it would be interesting to compare this with other toasters. I'll try publish this same rate tomorrow as well. Anyone out there?

Anyway, regardless of the numbers above, it is the philantropic, cool and experimental nature of this that really interests me

Update: Nov 21st -> 12 more visits refered from yournameontoast.com. Nov 22nd -> 3 more. Total visits for first 3 days: 24. The updated rate is 24 visits / $10.01 = 2.4 visits/$.

Pete from Your Name On Toast :: Your name, except on toast wrote me a nice e-mail letting me know about his site. I like the fact that 100% of the profits goes to charity. I think this is remarkable, so I went ahead and placed a toasty ad for this very same blog (one more time, there is something 'circular' about all this... check out my article on Borges, labyrinths, dreaming, graphs, trees, blogs, the internet and viral marketing).

Seth also wrote about the toasts page . I confess, yes, I'm addicted to Seth's blog.

My toast is not online yet, but I will try to update this post once it gets there, maybe with some traffic details or something alike . Go toast, feel good, have fun and also check out my previous post on mmmzr.

I'm soooo happy! Read about it here. Official site is here. Download the source code for Java SE, ME and EE editions (and the NetBeans IDE) here. Now celebrate!

Feeds are popping up everywhere. Readers and News aggregators are also becoming very popular. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, I suggest you read a few guides or articles. You can start here:

http://www.rssfeedguide.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_aggregator

A few days ago, I run into a planet. Planet is a very simple yet very powerful Python tool that can download several different feeds, aggregate them into a single one, and post the result on the web. Feedjack also does the job. As an example, you can see some planets here:

Planet Open Office

Planet Apache

Planet Ubuntu

There is, also (and all these are just some examples), an RSS aggregator plug-in available for the Serendipity blog system (which powers this very same website). You can find it in spartacus. By installing this plug-in in your serendipity blog, you can start aggregating feeds from around the web into your blog. This is really cool, and I think I will start doing so. However, I might slightly modify the plug-in or the Smarty templates to clearly differentiate where the posts are coming from (such as changing the colors, or adding a '[from ...'s blog]' notice. or a special category, you-get-the-point) and also to give more credits to their authors, etc.

So now a few questions arise...

Who is the copyright holder for the contents in the feed? Are the feed contents originals, or are they aggregated from other feeds? Are they violating other copyright holders' rights? What are the licenses behind them? Can you freely re-publish them for free in any media? Can you charge for the service of aggregating, or distributing them, or making them searchable, or simply archiving them? Can you make a derivative work and then distribute it for free or for a fee?

Another one: imagine, for example, a politician's or a celebrity feed being re-distributed on another website where the different context makes the content of a few articles from those feeds now to read completely different or inadequate...

How can we know the license feeds and their contents are published under and who is the copyright holder? I am no lawyer, but I guess the easier way is to just browse the publishing blog or website and/or e-mail the author asking if it's OK to do whatever it is you want to do with the content. I bet most of them will be very happy to know you are thinking on re-distributing their content and helping them reach more readers (as long as you clearly identify them as the author).

I know, I know... the original idea behind feeds itself is to easily share and distribute the content, but may be not all feed authors are thinking of their feeds being aggregated or re-distributed. On the other hand, some are only feeding part of their articles. I think at least some of them are just thinking of reaching their readers directly, and have not really considered the possibility of other intermediate sites or other media re-publishing their content, generating derivative works, etc.

So, anyway, there are a few Entrepreneurship, Marketing and Technology feeds out there that I would like to add to this blog, as a free and nice service to my readers. Yes, that's you! . I think I will search and ask their authors for their permission before publishing them though!

Again, I'm not a lawyer and whether something is legal or not is exactly my point. My point here is more about taste, about etiquette. It's just that ... it seems a bit rude to me to re-publish others' content without at least asking and letting them know what you are planning to do with it (unless of course they have clearly identified you have the freedom to do that --check out my content license on the right side bar!). Adding a link to their blog or site also seems like the good thing to do (and most planets do).

There are also some sites that the only thing they provide is the aggregation of other sites' feeds. If they don't provide any original content nor they provide any service other than aggregating other sites' content, How do you feel about them? How do you feel about them making money from the advertisements? What about if they are trying to make you believe it is their original content? Where is the line?

How do you feel about them if, when you search google for the keywords they represent (let's say, for instance, the name of a given celebrity), all you can find is these kind of sites? Should google penalize them on their page rank?

Under the agreement, Microsoft will provide sales support for Novell's SUSE Linux distribution. More importantly, the companies will also create a joint research facility where they will be working together on improving the interoperability between SUSE Linux and Microsoft Windows operating systems, including:

• Virtualization
• Web Services for managing physical and virtual servers (this builds, of course, on top of the Virtualization framework)
• Document format compatibility (between Open Office and Microsoft Office)

The first two will benefit mostly other companies, while the third aspect will greatly benefit both individuals and companies. I'm a big fun of Open Office. I use it all the time, and I'm already loving the idea of having better conversions between both suites.

Here is Reuter's news posted on the WSJ:

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/technology/tech-microsoft-novell.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Here are some links from Microsoft's PR site:

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/nov06/11-02MSNovellPR.mspx

http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/default.mspx

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/steve/2006/11-02NovellInterop.mspx

Novell has a dedicated site with plenty of information about the deal too:

http://www.novell.com/linux/microsoft/

Wanna know what some people is thinking? Digg has about two full pages (right now) for a simple search on Novell Microsoft (including plenty of comments):

http://www.digg.com/search?area=all&age=7&sort=new&s=novell+microsoft&submit=Search

Some other blogs posting about it:

http://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=35972

http://www.foogazi.com/2006/11/02/linux-software-on-windows/

http://opensourceblog.itproportal.com/?p=203

http://mrwavetheory.blogspot.com/2006/11/microsoft-and-novell-foes-now-friends.html

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061102-8141.html

And sooo many more. I shall stop though, or otherwise google might consider this post to be just a link farm.

So, my opinion? This is great, great news!

Not only this is great news because of this particular deal on itself and how both companies, their clients, their shareholders, individuals and other players can benefit from it, but also because it sets the record for the first big venture of its kind.

In other words, this will probably trigger other similar partnerships and stimulate more cooperation among different players in the industry as the market keeps opening itself and different organizations start doing business together at a more horizontal level. This will also be a very good boost for the market, brining new business and probably opening several opportunities to many other small players. It's just brilliant.